Tag Archives: Interchange

AlignCloud and HMS partner up

Host Merchant Services, an industry leading provider of payment processing and e-commerce services for small and medium businesses, announced a promising new partnership with cloud consulting firm AlignCloud. This partnership is the product of extensive research and collaboration and the bold new alliance  represents an exciting opportunity for customers to benefit from the combined expertise of these two companies.

AlignCloud tailors services for cloud providers and end-users alike. From cloud readiness assessment planning to cloud vendor management, AlignCloud provides indispensable services for all cloud customers. For cloud hosting providers, AlignCloud can help providers train sales staff, draft sales plans and fully engage with Web marketing and SEO. With its focus on the cloud and web hosting market, AlignCloud is a natural referral partner for Host Merchant Services.

HMS CEO Lou Honick has aptly summarized the buzz surrounding this collaboration. “Our expertise in e-commerce, payment cost optimization, and security meshes perfectly with AlignCloud to create compelling offerings,” Honick said of the AlignCloud partnership. AlignCloud clients can now seamlessly access secure, reliable merchant services, PCI compliance solutions, and e-commerce.

In the business world, demand for cloud services has reached an all time high. As mobile devices become more important for business, public worries about information security keep pace. Cloud Hosting is a type of hosting platform that allows customers powerful, scalable and reliable hosting based on clustered load-balanced servers and utility billing. Web hosting services allow individuals and organizations to make their website accessible via the World Wide Web.

For AlignCloud’s customers, HMS has designed services to insure absolute peace of mind. According to AlignCloud CEO Stacy Griggs, the program will provide clients with “lower rates and better service for credit card processing, mobile payments and merchant services.” The experts at HMS combine technical knowledge with uniquely dynamic customer service. Through expertise in data security and fraud reduction, Host Merchant Services promotes more confident commerce, both for businesses and customers alike.

A cloud hosted website can be more reliable than alternatives since other computers in the cloud can compensate when a single piece of hardware goes down. Also, local power disruptions or even natural disasters are less problematic for cloud hosted sites, as cloud hosting is decentralized. Cloud hosting also allows providers to charge users only for resources consumed by the user, rather than a flat fee for the amount the user expects they will use, or a fixed cost upfront hardware investment.

For Host Merchant Services, the partnership with AlignCloud is part of their successful strategy to partner with the web hosting and cloud services industry. Companies like AlignCloud can better serve clients by integrating credit card processing into their offerings. Through Host Merchant Services, AlignCloud customers will experience hassle-free credit card processing with 24x7x365 hour technical support and responsive website.

Clients of AlignCloud can also earn extra revenue by referring their customers to the program.

financial stock market graph and rows of coins growth abstract and symbol for finance concept business investment and currency 162020228

MCX, Paydiant, and the Battle Over Mobile Wallets [2023 Update]

The mobile Internet revolution is rapidly changing the longstanding status quo in the payment processing industry. As more people purchase items with their mobile devices, the public is demanding more options and greater security from transaction processing companies. For many long years, big banks and processing companies like Visa and Mastercard faced little competition and were free to change processing fees at will. Today, the upstart MCX network (Merchant Customer Exchange) is making a strong bid to compete in e-wallet services. This consortium of retailers recently added Kohl’s  to its roster of members. The cooperative already includes major players like Walmart, Target and Best Buy. Formed in August 2012, MCX has stated its intention to better protect consumer data, lower processing fees and otherwise improve conditions for mobile shoppers.

In many ways, MCX represents the most forward-looking hopes of the retail industry. Though the network is not fully operational, industry watchers are fascinated by the ways that MCX could change the e-commerce  landscape. In its bid to create a viable alternative payment network, MCX seeks to emulate the success of Paypal, the most successful independent online transaction processor. With its focus on mobile purchasing, MCX shows a feel for the developing trends of modern commerce. As the battle over mobile payment fees heats up, many consumers aren’t aware of how their payment choices effect the underlying struggle for lower fees in the mobile commerce sector.

Increasingly, large banks and financial companies are bringing enormous resources to bear in their efforts to woo mobile consumers and prolong their dominance. While these large institutions are currently making concessions to secure their position in mobile payments, one could persuasively argue that more choice will lead to greater satisfaction for participants in mobile commerce.

MCX Logo

Of course, MCX faces an uphill battle in its quest to change modern payments. Major banks and Interchange processors have rallied around Paydiant, the mainstream platform for e-wallet services. Though far from perfect, Paydiant has won broad acceptance for its widespread relevance and ease of use. Over the next few years, the competition between MCX and Paydiant will represent one front in the all-out war to control and define mobile payments. At the same time, Paypal will likely make every effort to extend its commanding position into the mobile commerce sector. While Google Wallet has yet to make major gains in mobile processing, it is never wise to underestimate the potential of this groundbreaking corporation.

Every month, dramatic numbers of people start using mobile payments to purchase goods and services. Familiar with brands like Visa and Mastercard, many of these consumers will gravitate towards Paydiant. At the same time, MCX has hired media-savvy personnel to potentially launch their brand into global prominence. If any group has a real chance of changing the status quo of modern transaction processing, it is MCX.

Paydiant

Compared to monolithic financial companies, retailers are arguably better poised to meet the changing needs of modern consumers. Only time will tell which mobile processing network will achieve the same kind of dominance that Paypal has realized in online payment processing. Though consumers are fairly loyal to major financial brands like Visa, the new decade tells a tale of increased public hunger for technological innovation and greater choice. Whoever succeeds in dominating mobile online payments, it is likely that consumers will experience a new era of speedy, secure transactions. As mobile devices continue to revolutionize modern culture, people from all walks of life will learn to appreciate the ease and convenience of doing business through cell phones and mobile devices. Experts can only guess at how many middle-class consumers will ultimately execute most of their daily payments online.

Interchange Settlement Given Preliminary OK

On Friday, the Judge presiding over the controversial Interchange Settlement case in Brooklyn, N.Y. gave preliminary approval to the settlement of credit card interchange litigation announced July 13. The Official Merchant Services Blog recently explained why the controversial Interchange settlement was being considered for preliminary approval, despite the backlash from merchants and large corporations. We also began talking about the possibility of ‘The Big Cash Comeback’ when the settlement was first announced, and later we discussed the opposition to the settlement.

U.S. District Judge John Gleeson indicated in late October that his cursory review showed that the settlement probably met the legal requirements for preliminary approval. He scheduled a hearing for Nov. 9 to get input from lawyers for the merchant plaintiffs and network and bank defendants. The judge said final approval requires a higher standard, and lawyers don’t expect final sign-off anytime before 2013. Opponents argued that the plan didn’t even meet the lower threshold for a preliminary approval.

The National Retail Federation, the leading retail-industry trade group and an outspoken foe of the agreement, quickly issued a statement saying it would “explore all legal options.” But the Electronic Payments Coalition, a lobbying group of card networks and banks, said it viewed Gleeson’s ruling “as further indication that this historic settlement is a fair and balanced resolution to the epic swipe-fee battle.”

The NRF’s Mallory Duncan said in a statement  that “retailers, their customers and competition would suffer irreparable harm if this one-sided deal is allowed to move forward. We will consult with our attorneys and act as soon as possible to correct this injustice.” The NRF is not a plaintiff in this case, and made no mention of which legal remedies it would pursue.

MasterCard Inc. general counsel Noah Hanft said in a statement that the settlement “was reached with the assistance of the court and was supported by the merchant class representing millions of large and small retailers, and prominent trade groups across the country.” MasterCard also said it remains confident that “the court will grant final approval in the coming months.”

Visa Inc. said “this settlement is a fair and reasonable compromise for all parties. It is the result of two years of negotiation between retailers, their legal counsel, the networks, financial institutions and two highly regarded mediators under the supervision of the court.”

Merchants and some trade associations sued Visa, MasterCard, and about a dozen banks in 2005 alleging credit card interchange is unfair under federal antitrust laws. With a trial set for September 2012, the parties reached a settlement that calls for the defendants to pay more than $6 billion in damages and temporarily lower credit interchange to the tune of $1.2 billion. The networks also are to grant relief from some of their rules, including an easing of restrictions on surcharging, and let merchants negotiate in groups in the interchange-setting process. In return, the merchants are to agree not to sue the networks over interchange and rules in the future.

Opponents said the plan would protect what they view as anti-competitive interchange practices from further challenges by merchants, even from merchants that don’t yet exist. Opponents also questioned the value of the new surcharging freedoms, noting that 10 states prohibit the practice. This settlement attempts to force a one-size-fits-all solution onto a wildly diverse group of merchants, which may be extremely unsuccessful.

While we have discussed this settlement from different aspects previously, noting the advantages it would seem to give the Issuing Banks over merchants, the settlement seems to be proceeding along without any further adjustment or negotiation. Although it is not finalized yet, the dissenter’s cries seem to be going unheard, as they believe that the settlement protects the status quo more than anything, and will not change the way the networks set interchange. Host Merchant Services will keep you informed of all the latest news involving this legal battle between the merchants and the card-issuing giants.